Strategy-proofness implies minimal participation under single-peakedness

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract We study a model in which agents with single-peaked preferences can participate costly voting procedure to determine the value of one-dimensional variable. show that, for all positive participation costs and profiles individual preferences, there exists unique equilibrium outcome one single participant whenever rule is strategy-proof, anonymous, responsive sense that reacts unanimous move votes same direction; moreover, always ‘extremist’ voters, i.e. either lowest or highest peak. While this uncovers strong tension between strategy-proofness deterministic rules on domain (just as case an unrestricted domain), are simple probabilistic strategy-proof induce full equilibrium.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On strategy-proofness and symmetric single-peakedness

We characterize the class of strategy-proof social choice functions on the domain of symmetric single-peaked preferences. This class is strictly larger than the set of generalized median voter schemes (the class of strategy-proof and tops-only social choice functions on the domain of single-peaked preferences characterized by Moulin (1980)) since, under the domain of symmetric single-peaked pre...

متن کامل

Monotonicity Implies Strategy-Proofness for Correspondences

We show that Maskin monotone social choice correspondences on sufficiently rich domains satisfy a generalized strategy-proofness property, thus generalizing Muller and Satterthwaite's (1977) theorem to correspondences. From the point of view of Nash implementation theory, the result yields a partial characterization of the restrictions entailed by Nash implementability. Alternatively, the resul...

متن کامل

On Merging Strategy-Proofness

Merging operators aim at defining the beliefs/goals of a group of agents from the beliefs/goals of each member of the group. Whenever an agent of the group has preferences over the possible results of the merging process (i.e. the possible merged bases), she can try to rig the merging process by lying on her true beliefs/goals if this leads to a better merged base according to her point of view...

متن کامل

Consensus and Single - Peakedness

Consider a set of K alternatives. We say that an alternative is socially acceptable if the number of individuals that rank it among their most preferred half of the alternatives is at least as large as the number of individuals that rank it among the least preferred half. A Condorcet winner is not necessarily socially acceptable. We propose a concept of consensus as a condition on preference pr...

متن کامل

Strategy-proofness in the Large∗

We propose a criterion of approximate incentive compatibility, strategy-proofness in the large (SP-L), and argue that it is a useful second-best to exact strategyproofness (SP) for market design. Conceptually, SP-L requires that an agent who regards a mechanism’s “prices” as exogenous to her report – be they traditional prices as in an auction mechanism, or price-like statistics in an assignmen...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Economic Theory Bulletin

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2196-1085', '2196-1093']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-023-00247-5